Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bill Hertz's avatar

I believe in playing to your strengths, in this game I’ll take two twos for one three. There will be games where we will not dominate inside and threes will be relied upon more. But increasing three-point attempts just to satisfy some unquantifiable results sounds a bit risky. I’m confident that there are many three- point happy teams that would love to trade some for our strength and ability to score inside. More importantly is the need to disrupt opponents long range shooting and and then rebounding those misses. Look at the Purdue vs Marquette game. Marquette took away Purdue’s outside game and forced them into making bad passes resulting in turnovers that led to a big loss! Making treys is important, but teams relying those too heavily win or lose on that stat alone.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts